The company explained that Enisuoh had four cases with the anti-graft commission out of which he won four.
It was stated that Enisuoh got a judgment of the Court of Appeal CA/L/1320/2016 delivered on 25/11/2017 to access his bank accounts which were frozen by the EFCC.
The firm said that in September 2022, one month after Tantita began operations, EFCC invited Enisuoh and asked him how he gained access to the accounts.
The statement alleged further that EFCC is giving a condition to Enisuoh to provide the names of those who received money from the account which he did not, as the persons concerned were intelligence assets who provided valuable intelligence and need to be protected.
Tracing the history of the current rift with the commission, the company said:
“Sometime in 2015/2016, EFCC commenced 4 cases against Warredi and several others. Of the four, three have been concluded, all in favour of Warredi.
“The last one is presently ongoing before Justice Faji of the Federal High Court Lagos. Before these cases were instituted, EFCC issued orders to various banks to block all Enisuoh’s bank accounts.
“He challenged this administrative order in court on the basis that the EFCC has no power to freeze accounts without a court order and the Federal High Court lifted the freeze orders.
“The banks failed to comply, so he brought contempt proceedings against them, somehow the new judge handling the contempt proceedings froze the accounts again. Warredi appealed to the Court of Appeal who overturned the 2nd judge and restored the orders of the first judge. Based on that judgment of the Court of Appeal in CA/L/1320/2016 delivered on 25/11/2017 the banks allowed Warredi access to his accounts. EFCC which was the 1st Respondent before the Court of Appeal in that case never appealed the judgment.
“Then in September 2022, one month after Tantita began operations, EFCC invited Warredi and asked him how he gained access to the accounts.
“He showed them certified true copies of the judgment of the Court of Appeal, they also asked him to make statements, which he did and pointed out that the questions bordered on the ongoing trial before the Federal High Court Lagos, the investigating team led by Lawal Aminu claimed to be unaware of the case, so he provided a certified true copy of the charge and pointed out that the prosecution was being led by Rotimi Oyedepo, a staff of the EFCC. He declined to make further statements on a matter subjudice.
“However as the war against oil thieves firmed up many of them have continued to threaten that those trying to stop their nefarious business would pay dearly for it.
“For the avoidance of doubt, the judgment of the Court of Appeal was delivered in 2017, more than five years ago. Again, Warredi is undergoing a full trial, would it not be better to let the courts decide who is right and who is wrong?”
No comments:
Post a Comment